Hi there at least you're following I wonder if you'll have the courage to come up to the realization of this truism. You can't claim your positions are in this paper unless you trying to deny the position of another research findings that goes further.

The findings invalidate your position as being real.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7980115/?report=printable

Are you willing to comment here and discuss this matter?

J Med Internet Res. 2021 Mar; 23(3): e25722.
Published online 2021 Mar 5. doi: 10.2196/25722: 10.2196/25722
PMCID: PMC7980115
PMID: 33666560
Linguistic Analysis of Online Communication About a Novel Persecutory Belief System (Gangstalking): Mixed Methods Study
Monitoring Editor: Rita Kukafka
Reviewed by Jun Wen Tan
Andrew Lustig, MD, MSc,corresponding author#1,2 Gavin Brookes, PhD,#3 and Daniel Hunt, PhD#4
1 Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada,
2 Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, ON, Canada,
3 ESRC Centre for Corpus Approaches to Social Science, Department of Linguistics and English Language, Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences, Lancaster University, Lancaster, United Kingdom,
4 School of English Studies, Faculty of Arts, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom,
Andrew Lustig, Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, 1051 Queen Street West, Toronto, ON, M6J1H3, Canada, Phone: 1 416 535 8501 ext 32841, Email: ac.hmac@gitsul.werdna.
corresponding authorCorresponding author.
#Contributed equally.
Corresponding Author: Andrew Lustig ac.hmac@gitsul.werdna
Received 2020 Nov 13; Revisions requested 2020 Dec 4; Revised 2020 Dec 11; Accepted 2021 Feb 8.
Copyright ©Andrew Lustig, Gavin Brookes, Daniel Hunt. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (http://www.jmir.org/), 05.03.2021.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on http://www.jmir.org/, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.
Abstract
Background
Gangstalking is a novel persecutory belief system whereby those affected believe they are being followed, stalked, and harassed by a large number of people, often numbering in the thousands. The harassment is experienced as an accretion of innumerable individually benign acts such as people clearing their throat, muttering under their breath, or giving dirty looks as they pass on the street. Individuals affected by this belief system congregate in online fora to seek support, share experiences, and interact with other like-minded individuals. Such people identify themselves as targeted individuals.

Objective
The objective of the study was to characterize the linguistic and rhetorical practices used by contributors to the gangstalking forum to construct, develop, and contest the gangstalking belief system.

Methods
This mixed methods study employed corpus linguistics, which involves using computational techniques to examine recurring linguistic patterns in large, digitized bodies of authentic language data. Discourse analysis is an approach to text analysis which focuses on the ways in which linguistic choices made by text creators contribute to particular functions and representations. We assembled a 225,000-word corpus of postings on a gangstalking support forum. We analyzed these data using keyword analysis, collocation analysis, and manual examination of concordances to identify discursive and rhetorical practices among self-identified targeted individuals.

Results
The gangstalking forum served as a site of discursive contest between 2 opposing worldviews. One is that gangstalking is a widespread, insidious, and centrally coordinated system of persecution employing community members, figures of authority, and state actors. This was the dominant discourse in the study corpus. The opposing view is a medicalized discourse supporting gangstalking as a form of mental disorder. Contributors used linguistic practices such as presupposition, nominalization, and the use of specialized jargon to construct gangstalking as real and external to the individual affected. Although contributors generally rejected the notion that they were affected by mental disorder, in some instances, they did label others in the forum as impacted/affected by mental illness if their accounts if their accounts were deemed to be too extreme or bizarre. Those affected demonstrated a concern with accumulating evidence to prove their position to incredulous others.

Conclusions
The study found that contributors to the study corpus accomplished a number of tasks. They used linguistic practices to co-construct an internally coherent and systematized persecutory belief system. They advanced a position that gangstalking is real and contested the medicalizing discourse that gangstalking is a form of mental disorder. They supported one another by sharing similar experiences and providing encouragement and advice. Finally, they commiserated over the challenges of proving the existence of gangstalking.

Can you actually provide a statement or are you just going to ghost this forever?

Official: Gang Stalking is Real!!

The truth asserted in this comment has an published research analyzed to result findings published on the National Institutes of Health. .

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7980115/?report=printable

Linguistic Analysis of Online Communication About a Novel Persecutory Belief System (Gangstalking): Mixed Methods Study

Monitoring Editor: Rita Kukafka

Reviewed by Jun Wen Tan

Andrew Lustig, MD, MSc,#1,2 Gavin Brookes, PhD,#3 and Daniel Hunt, PhD

Conclusions

The study found that contributors to the study corpus accomplished a number of tasks. They used linguistic practices to co-construct an internally coherent and systematized persecutory belief system. They advanced a position that gangstalking is real and contested the medicalizing discourse that gangstalking is a form of mental disorder. They supported one another by sharing similar experiences and providing encouragement and advice. Finally, they commiserated over the challenges of proving the existence of gangstalking.

Keywords: internet, discourse analysis, psychosis, delusions, linguistics, language, online discourse, corpus linguistics, computer mediated communication, schizophrenia, eHealth


The research findings holds that gang stalking is real. Also found is the proven false that targeted individuals are suffering by mental illness, paranoia, and mass delusion.

We have a problem in the United States.

We have an hidden world of gang stalking.

This activity is extremely harming in intentional assaults in mental abuse / mind control methods.

This is sourced as a secret hate agenda against Targeted Individuals.

Much of this activity is invisible harm being intensely done.

The end game of thee informational warfare is the complete annihilation of a human life, to ruin a person even to death.

There appears a legal definitions video under the title:

https://youtu.be/B5uVC7VZEI0
What.ia gang stalking?

by LawDepot.com.

My mother and I are preparing to walk together from our family home to the Los Angeles / United States Office.

Main Sharing Topic of Interest Community Sharing MEME asdress:


http://webdomains.gruwup.net/lawdepot.com/Hey-Hey-Hey.ForevermoreCruel.911-Emergency.ogg


###
YES YOU HEARD WALKING, STEP BY STEP HUMAN.PROJECT
#!##

------[ folder: lawpot.com ]----

http://webdomains.gruwup.net/lawdepot.com/



-----[ Folder: Request For Help From Google / Comments via Feedback ]----

http://google.fuckeduphuman.space/

http://google.fuckeduphuman.space/Feedback/


http://google.fuckeduphuman.space/Feedback/From%20James%20Driskill%20<inthemindway@gmail.com&.ogg